| Model Number |
FPRPR3508 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Thermal Decomposition of Device (1071)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Superficial (First Degree) Burn (2685)
|
| Date of Event |
08/03/2026
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that there was frost on the needle shaft.An icerod plus 90 degree needle was selected for use in a cryoablation procedure.During the procedure, it was observed that the entire needle shaft was covered in frost.The procedure was immediately halted; the needle was warmed and removed.The patient suffered mild frostbite on the skin, which was treated with warm water compresses.This was a first-degree burn.The cryoablation needle was replaced with another of the same to complete the procedure.It was noted that patient treatment was delayed as a result of this event.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that there was frost on the needle shaft.An icerod plus 90 degree needle was selected for use in a cryoablation procedure.During the procedure, it was observed that the entire needle shaft was covered in frost.The procedure was immediately halted; the needle was warmed and removed.The patient suffered mild frostbite on the skin, which was treated with warm water compresses.This was a first-degree burn.The cryoablation needle was replaced with another of the same to complete the procedure.It was noted that patient treatment was delayed as a result of this event.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Initial reporter address 2: (b)(6).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Initial reporter address 2: (b)(6).Investigation results:
the device was not returned for analysis; therefore, a technical analysis could not be performed.Good faith effort attempts were made to try and retrieve the device, but the device has not been returned.Device history record review:
the device history record review confirmed that the device met all material, assembly, and performance specifications prior to distribution.Labeling review:
review of the instructions for use (ifu) confirmed there was relevant content and sufficient guidance with respect to the circumstances described within this complaint.No updates are required to the ifu as a result of this event.Risk review:
a risk review was completed and confirmed that the event was defined in the risk documentation.This event type has been accounted for during product risk analysis to support acceptable risk benefit for the product.Investigation conclusion:
based on a thorough review of the reported complaint, boston scientific has assigned an investigation conclusion code of cause traced to component failure.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|