|
A patient underwent a biopsy procedure using a magnum instrument.During the procedure, it was reported that the cannula hub was fractured and/or crumbled, compromising its integrity and preventing the procedure from being safely continued.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
H11: based on the provided photograph, it was confirmed that the issue involved a cannula hub break rather than a needle break.Based on this updated information, the complaint was reassessed for reportability and determined to be no longer reportable.Since an initial mdr was submitted, therefore, the file will remain assessed as a malfunction.Manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not required as this is the only complaint reported to date for this product and lot.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.Two electronic photos were provided and reviewed.First photo is the zoomed-in version of the second photo, and both the photos shows one magnum needle, and the cannula hub of magnum needle was noted be broken.Based on the photo review, the reported hub break can be confirmed.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for the reported hub break as a break was noted on the cannula hub.A definitive root cause for the alleged break issue could not be determined based upon the provided information.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.B3.The date received by manufacturer has been used for this field.B5, g3, h6 (component, method, result, conclusion)
section a through f: the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|