| Catalog Number |
1151520 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Material Deformation (2976)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Adhesion(s) (1695); Bacterial Infection (1735); Pain (1994); Hernia (2240); Obstruction/Occlusion (2422)
|
| Date of Event |
07/18/2019
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Per information provided:
on (b)(6) 2014 - patient was diagnosed with ventral hernia thereby underwent open repair with the implant of ventralex st mesh (device 1).Per op notes, "a supraumbilical incision was made, a ventralex st mesh (device 1) was placed into the hernia defect using prolene sutures."
on (b)(6) 2015 - patient was diagnosed with recurrent incisional hernia thereby underwent laparoscopic repair with the implant of synthetic mesh.Per op notes, "there was noted to be the old mesh at the level of the umbilicus and on the scar tissue, the scar was excised.Then a synthetic mesh was placed."
on (b)(6) 2017 - patient underwent excision of the abdominal wall scar.On (b)(6) 2017 - patient was diagnosed with chronic abdominal wall infection and adhesions thereby underwent repair with removal of ventralex st mesh (device 1) and synthetic mesh and implant of xenmatrix ab (device 2).(notes: no op notes were provided).On (b)(6) 2019 - patient was diagnosed with recurrent incisional hernia thereby underwent repair removal of mesh (device 2).Per op notes, "included with hernia sac the old xenmatrix ab (device 2) which had ballooned into the defect and was adherent to the hernia sac itself and was removed.The mesh that was removed showed mrsa involvement.Patient also had issues with a bowel obstruction and also had a constant pain.Then a synthetic mesh was placed.".
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Root cause is inconclusive; no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-nov-2016) is considered to be a best estimate.This emdr represents the xenmatrix ab (device 2).An additional supplemental emdr was submitted to represent the ventralex st (device 1).Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|