|
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION Flexima? Nasobiliary Catheter; catheter, biliary, diagnostic
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Model Number |
M00540130 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Leak/Splash (1354); Material Split, Cut or Torn (4008)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Fever (1858); Insufficient Information (4580)
|
| Date of Event |
05/26/2026
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a flexima nasobiliary catheter was used for dilation of the intra and extrahepatic bile ducts with stone removal in the descending duodenum during an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ercp), endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (enbd), and biliary stent placement procedure performed on (b)(6) 2026.Following the procedure, the patient's jaundice worsened.Subsequent computed tomography imaging demonstrated dislodgement of the enbd drainage tube and prolapse of the biliary stent.On (b)(6) 2026, the patient underwent a repeat ercp with enbd placement and biliary stent replacement; however, no clinical improvement was observed.The originally placed nasobiliary drainage tube was removed using foreign body forceps.A follow-up ct scan performed on (b)(6) 2026, assessed the enbd and biliary stent placement.Further ct imaging performed thereafter was reviewed with the radiology department, which confirmed that the drainage tube remained in situ, with the distal tip of the enbd located in the lower common bile duct.On the same day, the attending physician performed a bedside saline flush of the enbd tube and identified a crack in the plastic at the connection between the enbd tube and drainage bag.During flushing, saline leaked/sprayed from the side of the enbd tubing, indicating device damage.The head of gastroenterology was consulted and advised that the enbd should be removed.Given the lack of improvement in jaundice despite enbd drainage, the condition and treatment options were discussed with the patient.The patient agreed, and the enbd tube was removed.It was further reported that the patient experienced fever and that the reported serious injury was related to the lack of improvement in the patient's jaundice.The patient's outcome was reported as stable.Additional information received on september 2,2026
it was reported that the nasobiliary drainage catheter was removed on (b)(6) 2026 and that no stent was used.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Block b5 has been updated with the additional information received on september 2, 2026.Block e1:
initial reporter facility name:(b)(6); reported here as this exceeded character limit for designated field.Block h6:
imdrf patient code e2401 captures the reportable event of persistent jaundice.Imdrf impact code f07 captures the reportable event of exacerbation of existing condition.Imdrf impact code f23 captures the reportable event of additional procedure performed to address the persistent patient condition.Imdrf impact code f2203 captures the reportable event of imaging required.Imdrf impact code f2301 captures the reportable event of additional device required.Block h11:
investigation results:
based on all available information, boston scientific corporation was unable to confirm the reported events of additional device required, exacerbation of existing condition, patient problem/medical problem, unexpected medical intervention, imaging required and fever.The complaint device was not returned; therefore, product analysis could not be performed.Taking all available information into consideration the investigation findings did not lead to a definitive conclusion regarding the cause of the reported events.Without proper evaluation of the device, the most probable contributing cause remains unknown.Device history records review:
it was confirmed this device met manufacturing specifications prior to distribution and there were no manufacturing deviations which could have contributed to the reported event.Similar complaint review:
a similar complaint review was completed.There were no emerging trends identified that warrant further action.Device technical analysis:
the complaint device was not returned; therefore, product analysis could not be performed.Risk review:
a risk review was completed and confirmed that the reported events of patient problem/medical problem and unexpected medical intervention was defined in the risk documentation.These event types have been accounted for during product risk analysis to support acceptable risk benefit for the product.Investigation conclusion
based on a thorough review of the reported complaint, boston scientific has assigned an investigation conclusion code of cause not established.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|