|
H11: manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed, and this lot met all release criteria.Investigation summary: although the physical device was not returned for evaluation, three photos were provided for review.The first photo show's partial view of a clinician holding the drainage catheter implanted into patient body and having residue on the hub.A complete break was noted on the catheter hub, and broken piece was missing in the provided photo.The second photo show's partial view of a clinician holding the drainage catheter and external connector.A longitudinal crack was noted on the catheter hub.The third photo show's partial view of a clinician holding the drainage catheter in which residue was noted on the hub.A longitudinal crack was noted on the catheter hub.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for the reported drainage catheter connector fracture issues for all the three devices, and the investigation is confirmed for the identified material separation issue for the first device.The definitive root cause could not be determined based upon available information.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.E1: (b)(6).Section a through f: the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|