|
The surgical issue questionnaire was reviewed for potential causes of the reported issue.Based on this review, implanting the device off-label, not performing an x-ray immediately after the implant procedure to confirm device placement, inadequate fixation, implanting a damaged neurostimulator, implanting the neurostimulator after the expiration date, not prepping the surface of the skin with an antiseptic solution, multiple tunneling attempts, using incorrect tools, and not prescribing antibiotics pre-operatively have been ruled out.Additionally, the patient having contraindicating conditions, the patient touching or picking at the wound, and severe force being applied to the implant have been ruled out.However, a surgical issue was identified as the incision site was not irrigated with an antibiotic solution before closure.Additionally, the incision site was closed using staples which is non-compliant to the ifu.\
\
a curonix representative conducted a review of sterilization and packaging records for the respective product lot; curonix has confirmed that the product was delivered sterile, validated sterilization parameters were used, and sterile barriers were verified to be intact following packaging.\
\
the stimulator is used to treat pain.Although the cause the discoloration and erosion are unknown, a surgical issue was identified as the incision site was not irrigated with an antibiotic solution before closure (user error-clinician).Additionally, non-compliance to the ifu was identified as the incision site was closed using staples (user error-clinician).\
\
rates reviewed at the most recent complaint trending meeting do not indicate a significant increase in surgical issues.Surgical issue rates remain acceptably low; thus, a capa is not required at this time.Surgical issue rates will continue to be tracked and trended.
|