| Model Number |
TCDS0801-XTW |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Difficult to Remove (1528)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Unspecified Tissue Injury (4559)
|
| Date of Event |
08/21/2026
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that on (b)(6) 2026, a patient presented with grade 4 functional tricuspid regurgitation (tr) for a triclip procedure.During the procedure, transesophageal echocardiogram (tee) probe was not able to enter the stomach due to esophageal restriction.Mid and deep esophageal views were adequate, and ice imaging was adequate and physician decided to proceed.Right access was attempted and could not advance guide to the right atria due to torturous and restricted iliac.Attempt was made with the left access; it was difficult to advance and eventually advanced triclip steerable guide catheter (tsgc) into the right atria.Due to tortuosity, it was difficult for septal and lateral movements of the guide to translate.First triclip was attempted but ended up pulling back to inferior, physician decided to remove the clip and wanted to replace it with teh new clip.Second triclip xtw was introduced into the right atria, steered down to the tricuspid valve and was aligned in the atria within the desired location.Leaflets were grasped and due to less impact on the tr, physician moved the clip more central and crossed under the valve for the second attempt.During the second attempt to grasp the leaflets, clip got caught on the sub valvular chords.After several attempts, clip was able to retract into the atria but was evident that chordae were ruptured.During removal of the clip, clip was caught on the eustachian valve.Clip was successfully freed from the eustachian valve with some difficulty and pulled back into the tsgc.Devices were removed from the patient.The final tr was grade 4.There were no adverse patient effects or clinically significant delays reported.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that on (b)(6) 2026, a patient presented with grade 4 functional tricuspid regurgitation (tr) for a triclip procedure.During the procedure, transesophageal echocardiogram (tee) probe was not able to enter the stomach due to esophageal restriction.Mid and deep esophageal views were adequate, and ice imaging was adequate and physician decided to proceed.Right access was attempted and could not advance guide to the right atria due to torturous and restricted iliac.Attempt was made with the left access; it was difficult to advance and eventually advanced triclip steerable guide catheter (tsgc) into the right atria.Due to tortuosity, it was difficult for septal and lateral movements of the guide to translate.First triclip was attempted but ended up pulling back to inferior, physician decided to remove the clip and wanted to replace it with teh new clip.Second triclip xtw was introduced into the right atria, steered down to the tricuspid valve and was aligned in the atria within the desired location.Leaflets were grasped and due to less impact on the tr, physician moved the clip more central and crossed under the valve for the second attempt.During the second attempt to grasp the leaflets, clip got caught on the sub valvular chords.After several attempts, clip was able to retract into the atria but was evident that chordae were ruptured.During removal of the clip, clip was caught on the eustachian valve.Clip was successfully freed from the eustachian valve with some difficulty and pulled back into the tsgc.Devices were removed from the patient.The final tr was grade 4.There were no adverse patient effects or clinically significant delays reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Investigation is not yet complete.A follow-up report will be submitted with all additional relevant information.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
In this case, the reported difficult to remove from the anatomy could not be replicated in a testing environment.A review of the lot history record revealed no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to the reported event.A review of the complaint history identified no similar complaints from the lot.Based on the information reviewed, the cause of the reported difficult to remove the clip from the anatomy resulting in tissue injury cannot be determined.Tissue damage is a known possible complication associated with triclip procedures.Serious injury/illness/impairment was a result of case-specific circumstances.There is no indication of a product issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|