|
It was reported that during a procedure for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, a versacross connect access solution for faradrive was selected for use.Prior to the procedure, an echocardiogram was performed and showed no evidence of thrombus or pericardial effusion.During transseptal access, the first puncture attempt was unsuccessful because the wire did not advance appropriately.The physician repositioned the system and a second attempt was successful.The transseptal puncture was performed under echocardiographic guidance.Approximately 30 minutes after ablation had commenced, during ablation of the third right inferior pulmonary vein (ripv), a significant drop in the patient's blood pressure was observed.Echocardiographic evaluation revealed a pericardial fluid collection along the anterior aspect of the right ventricle.At the time the event was identified, the catheter was reported to be located within the inferior vena cava.The procedure was completed and pericardial drainage was performed to address the accumulating blood.Due to the severity of the event, a cardiac surgeon was consulted and surgical intervention was undertaken.Following surgical opening of the chest, a perforation was identified in the anterior portion of the right atrium/right ventricular region.Approximately 1.5 liters of blood were drained from the pericardial space.The patient required a blood transfusion and surgical repair with internal suturing of the perforation was performed.The patient required hospitalization and/or prolongation of hospitalization due to the event.It was further reported that the versacross access solution remained inside the patient's body when the patient complication began.The rf wire was exposed during the transseptal procedure.No issues were reported with the ablation procedure, no thrombus was observed, and no device malfunction was identified.It was confirmed that blood leakage from the right atrium into the pericardial space occurred, resulting in cardiac tamponade.However, it could not be confirmed whether the tamponade was caused by the wire or the dilator.In the physician's opinion, the access solution (transseptal products) contributed to the patient complication.
|