|
It was reported that the patient implanted with this artificial urinary sphincter (aus) experienced recurrent incontinence approximately six months post-implantation and three months after device activation.The patient reported that the device was no longer functioning properly and that symptoms of incontinence had returned.During a clinical examination, it was determined that there was a potential device-related issue, and revision surgery was scheduled to investigate the cause.During the surgical procedure, after the pump was exposed, it was observed that saline was not returning from the pressure-regulating balloon to the pump as expected.Troubleshooting was performed; however, no cause could be identified.The saline volume within the balloon was measured and found to be 23 cc, consistent with the volume documented during the original implantation procedure.Based on this finding, it was initially concluded that the balloon was functioning properly.To minimize unnecessary component replacement, only the pump was explanted and replaced.The newly implanted pump was connected to the existing system, and the aus was tested through three complete cycles.The system functioned normally during all three cycles, suggesting that the issue was likely related to the original pump.Therefore, no additional components, including the cuff or pressure-regulating balloon, were explanted.No additional patient complications were reported.
|