|
Device evaluation summary:\
\
the product was returned to mentor for evaluation, where a thorough investigation was conducted.\
\
during visual evaluation, no apparent damage or visual anomalies were observed on the returned device.\
\
as part of mentor's quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released according to approved specifications.Based on the results of this investigation, it was determined that the product met the manufacturing release criteria: since no malfunction was observed during the investigation.No corrective and preventive action (capa) is required now.\
\
additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals is conducted through complaint trending as part of post-market surveillance.\
\
reason for device explant and/or reoperation: trauma to chest from a fall, left breast prosthesis rupture.\
\
mentor is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which mentor has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, mentor, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mentor, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If certain information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.\
\
manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|