|
(b)(4).Date sent: 9/22/2026.D4 batch # a99v8l.Investigation summary.The product was returned for evaluation.Visual inspection and functional testing were conducted on the returned device.Visual analysis of the returned sample determined that the el5ml device was received with no apparent damage to the external components.In an attempt to replicate the reported incident, the device underwent functional testing.During evaluation, it was observed that clips failed to advance into the jaws upon subsequent trigger actuations.To further assess the condition of the internal components, the device was disassembled.Upon disassembly, the feed link was found to be broken, which disrupted the clip advancement mechanism and resulted in the observed feeding issue.Additionally, fourteen (14) clips were identified within the clip track.The broken feed link is considered the likely cause of the reported failure to feed clips into the jaws.The event reported was confirmed and it is related to improper use of the device.Possible causes for the damage found is due to the jaws may have been restricted during firing, or not fully through the trocar during firing.As part of ees quality process all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device batch a99v8l number, and no non-conformances were identified.Additional information was requested, and the following was obtained:
how did device not work?
did device jammed (not fire clips)?
did device not feed clips?
did device drop or eject clips?
did device sideways feed clips?
did device fire malformed clips?
did device fire scissored clips?
if other please specify.I did not get a response from the surgeon.No further information available.
|