|
An impella rp flex was inserted via the right internal jugular vein in a 61-year-old female with diabetes mellitus who was status post heartmate 3 left ventricular assist device implantation two days prior to rp flex placement.The patient had been supported with femoral veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (va-ecmo), inotropes/vasopressors, and respiratory support and remained with an open chest.The patient's clinical state prior to initiation of support was society for cardiovascular angiography and interventions (scai) stage e cardiogenic shock, identified by refractory shock in which the body is failing to respond to maximal lifesaving therapies with progressive end-organ dysfunction.Prior to rp flex implantation, ultrasound evaluation of the right internal jugular vein and superior vena cava did not identify thrombus.Heparin was administered prior to insertion.Following rp flex placement, va-ecmo was decannulated, thereby transitioning the patient from va-ecmo support to impella rp flex support for right ventricular mechanical circulatory support.The rp flex was temporarily reduced to performance level two (p2) during venous cannula removal, with no change in rp flow.Overnight, the patient remained clinically stable.No additional systemic anticoagulation was administered due to bleeding risk.The purge solution consisted of dextrose 5% in water (d5w) with 25 meq/l sodium bicarbonate.On the day following implant, the patient underwent chest washout and sternotomy closure.Shortly after chest closure, rp flex flow decreased to 0.1 l/min.Due to concern for possible thrombus ingestion, the clinical team elected to explant the impella rp flex.The device was removed on the day after implantation.Laboratory values obtained approximately six hours prior to the flow reduction included activated partial thromboplastin time (aptt) 54.7 seconds, international normalized ratio (inr) 2.7, hemoglobin 8.4 g/dl, and hematocrit 24%.Activated clotting time (act) values were not reported; therefore, a comprehensive review of anticoagulation management was limited.Additional information received confirmed that no alternative right ventricular mechanical support device was subsequently placed.The reported low-flow event and concern for possible thrombus ingestion occurred in the setting of recent heartmate 3 implantation, prior va-ecmo support, open chest status, limited anticoagulation due to bleeding risk, and critical cardiogenic shock.These factors may increase the risk of thrombus formation and impaired flow during mechanical circulatory support.Activated clotting time values were not reported; therefore, a comprehensive assessment of anticoagulation management was limited.
|
|
This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by abiomed inc or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, abiomed inc, or its employees, caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|