|
Investigation summary:
with all the available information, boston scientific is unable to confirm cause of the reported clinical observation of cardiac tamponade, perforation and hypotension.The device has not been received for analysis; therefore, a technical analysis of the complaint device could not be completed.Device history record review:
the manufacturing batch record review confirmed that the device met all material, assembly, and performance specifications.Device technical analysis:
it was indicated the device was disposed for return; therefore, a technical analysis of the complaint device could not be completed.Risk review:
a risk review performed for the versacross rf wire device confirmed that the events of cardiac tamponade, perforation and hypotension are known events defined in the product risk management documentation.This event type has been accounted for during product risk analysis to support acceptable risk benefit for the product.Product risk benefit includes consideration of risk severity and rate, and the overall residual risk of the versacross rf wire device is acceptable.Labeling review:
based on the information provided, there is no evidence that the device was used in a manner inconsistent with the labelled indications/instructions for use.Investigation conclusion:
based on the available information, boston scientific's investigation findings were unable to establish a clear conclusion about the cause of the reported event.The device met all requirements prior to being approved for final distribution/sale and there was no evidence to suggest that the instructions for use (ifu) was not followed.
|