|
It was reported that on (b)(6) 2026, a 23mm navitor vision valve was selected for implant using a small flexnav delivery system (ds).The patient's femoral was observed to be calcified and the right femoral vessel was selected as the access site.No issues were observed with the loading process.During the procedure, fluoroscopy showed that the ds was unable to be advance external iliac artery which was observed to be narrowed.The physician pushed/rotated the ds in an attempt to advance; however, the difficulty remained unchanged.Upon removal from the patient's anatomy, ds was observed to be damaged.A second 23mm, navitor vision valve was replaced using a new small flexnav ds.A stiffer non-abbott wire was replaced and the advancement was initiated.Once again, the ds was unable to advance at the external iliac.Multiple attempts were made to advance narrow anatomy, but the results remained unchanged.Upon removal from the patient's anatomy, ds was observed to be damaged.The physician selected left femoral as the access site.A third 23mm, navitor vision valve was selected for implant using a small flexnav ds and the system was able to be loaded without any issues.The valve was able to be implanted successfully.No issues were observed on the right vascular system while closing them.The patient remained hemodynamically stable throughout the procedure and there was no clinically significant delay reported.The patient was in a stable condition and subsequently discharged.
|