|
(b)(4)
date sent: 9/23/2026
d4 batch#: z7010p.Investigation summary
the product was returned for evaluation.Visual inspection and functional testing were conducted on the returned device.The device was returned with the distal tip of the blade broken off, and it was returned with the device.The remaining blade portion was scratched, with evidence of contact with metal in or out of the operative field.Additionally, the tissue pad was melted, not all present and the missing portion was not returned.During functional testing on energy systems, an alert screen was displayed.A probable cause for the device to stop activating and the energy systems to display an alert screen is blade damage.The device was disassembled to verify the condition of the internal components, and no anomalies were found.Probable causes of blade damage, including breakage, are external contact during pre-op or general use, and blade contact with other devices, staples or clips during the procedure.Once minor blade damage has occurred, subsequent activations may increase the severity of the blade damage.This in turn can result in activation issues such as failing the pre-run test with the generator and displaying an alert screen.These alert screens that can result are such as "remove instrument from patient" or ¿blade error detected¿ or "relaxed pressure on blade" followed by a ¿replace instrument¿ screen later in the procedure.Continued usage of the damage blade can result in a broken blade.Probable causes of tissue pad damage are applying pressure between the instrument blade and tissue pad without having tissue between them.Keep the clamp arm open when back cutting or while the blade is active without tissue between the blade and tissue pad to avoid damage to the tissue pad.As part of ees quality process all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot/batch z7010p, and no non-conformances were.
|