|
According to the customer contact, at the beginning of the procedure, the device "would not burn"; a new device was pulled with no issues, there was no injury or medical intervention reported, and the procedure was completed.The device was returned with a medline renewal package and label, but during the initial inspection, no medline renewal reprocessing marks were observed on the device, and it was observed that the device had an oem rfid paddle.No further investigation was performed, and the cause code was updated to reflect unconfirmed defect - item not purchased from medline.It was determined that the received device was oem and had not been reprocessed by medline renewal; there has been no change to the reportability decision associated with this complaint.There were no reports of death, serious injury, medical intervention, or follow up care.It has been determined that the reported event could cause or contribute to serious injury if it were to occur again.In an abundance of caution, this is a reportable event.If additional information becomes available this report will be reopened and reevaluated.This medical device report (mdr) is being submitted as part of retrospective review activities, which include review of historical data in accordance with regulations at 21 cfr part 803.The information included in this mdr reflects the information reasonably known to the manufacturer at the time of this retrospective review and submission.
|