|
A lifevent evo2 ventilator was returned to a third-party service center following display of a ventilator service required message.There was no allegation of patient harm, and the device was not reported to have been in patient use.During preliminary ¿inprocess¿ evaluation at the third-party service center, the device event log was reviewed and identified error code 81-evt_obm_valve_failure, indicating that the o2 proportional valve, which controls the flow of o2 to the blower inlet, was mechanically stuck closed or open.Error code 149-evt_o2_flow_stuck was also identified, indicating that o2 flow communication had ceased and the sensor was reporting the same value.The technician recommended replacement of the oxygen blender module (obm) to address both critical errors.Additionally, replacement of the obm was expected to address the condition associated with the evt_o2_pressure_railed_low alarm, indicating that the o2 pressure sensor had railed to a maximum negative value.Other errors were also identified during the evaluation; however, they were reported as not requiring attention at this time.No repair had been completed at the time of this report because the customer's approval of the repair quote was pending.A final report is being submitted.If additional information becomes available following completion of the device repair that impacts the investigation findings or medical device reporting determination, a supplemental report will be submitted.
|
|
The reported failure of device's oxygen blender module (obm) is accommodated in the product risk management file as being linked to hazard with description patient exposure to function / deterioration of function.Complaints for this failure are reviewed via the post market complaint trending and escalation processes to assess for the observed probability levels and compare them with the predicted levels in the risk file for the hazards linked to the failure.As of the date of submission for this report, there is no indication that complaints for the failure in question has led to unacceptable increase in probability levels for the hazardous situations in scope, and therefore no further action will be pursued.Qa continues to monitor complaints for this issue per the cadence in the complaint trending procedures.Dhr review was performed for the complaint device sn: (b)(6) review confirms that the device met the final acceptance criteria and was released for final distribution.
|