|
(b)(4)
date sent 9/24/2026
d4 batch # 648d86.Investigation summary
the product was returned for thorough evaluation, which included visual inspections and functional testing of the returned reload.Visual analysis of the returned sample determined that one sr55 reload was received with no apparent damaged and the reload had the proximal 2 drivers up and the remaining drivers down with staples present and a swing tab in the locked position.However, when an attempt was made to fire the test device, the firing mechanism became jammed at the position where the drivers were deployed.As a result, no functional testing could be completed due to the condition of the reload.The reload was subsequently disassembled to assess the internal components.Examination revealed damage to one leg of the knife assembly, as well as damage to the reload body in the corresponding area.No conclusion could be reached how the knife assembly was damaged.As part of ethicon endo surgery¿s quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device batch number 648d86, and no non-conformances were identified.Additional information was requested, and the following was obtained:
1.Could you please clarify if there were any patient consequences?
it¿s unknown.2.Could you please clarify if there were any change in the post-operative care of the patient as a result of the event?
it¿s unknown.
|