| Model Number |
FX103T |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Infusion or Flow Problem (2964)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Hydrocephalus (3272)
|
| Date of Event |
09/03/2026
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a shuntassistant 2.0 (#fx103t) was implanted on (b)(6) 2024.According to the complainant, the shunt system caused an over drainage.The patient underwent a revision procedure on (b)(6) 2026.Related to medwatchno: 3004721439-2026-00276.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a progav 2.0 valve (#fx410t) was implanted on (b)(6) 2024.According to the complainant, the shunt system caused an overdrainage.The patient underwent a revision procedure on (b)(6) 2026.Related to medwatchno.: 3004721439-2026-00277.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Visual inspection
during the investigation, some tissue residue on the device was determined.Permeability test
a permeability test has shown that all components are permeable.Computer controlled test
to investigate the claim of over- drainage, the opening pressure is measured using a miethke computer controlled testing apparatus which simulates a cerebrospinal fluid flow.The valve is tested in vertical/ or both the horizontal as well as the vertical positions.The results show that the shuntassistant 2.0 operates within the accepted tolerance in both positions.Internal inspection
after dismantling of the valve, organic deposits were found.Results
based on our investigation results, we can determine organic deposits.The deposits had no effect on the technical properties at the time of the investigation.The cause of the aforementioned functional impairment is not known to us at the time of the examination.Organic matter in the cerebrospinal fluid can influence the function temporarily and are known inherent side effects in hydrocephalus therapy.We can exclude a defect at the time of release.The valve met all specifications of the final inspection when released from christoph miethke gmbh & co.Kg.No further regulatory actions are required from our point of view.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Visual inspection
during the investigation, no significant deformation or damage of the valve was determined.Permeability test
a permeability test has indicated that the valve has a blockage.Computer controlled test
to investigate the claim of over- drainage, the opening pressure is measured using a miethke computer controlled testing apparatus which simulates a cerebrospinal fluid flow.The valve is tested in the horizontal position.Because the valve is not permeable, a computer controlled test is not applicable.Adjustment test
the progav 2.0 was tested and is not adjustable.Braking force and brake function test
the brake functionality test has shown that the brake function is operational.However the braking force cannot be measured due to the non-adjustability of the valve.Internal inspection
after dismantling of the valve, organic deposits were found.Results
based on our investigation results, we can determine a blockage of the valve.The determined organic deposits can be named as the cause for the functional deviation.Organic matter in the cerebrospinal fluid can influence the function temporarily and are known inherent side effects in hydrocephalus therapy.We can exclude a defect at the time of release.The valve met all specifications of the final inspection when released from christoph miethke gmbh & co.Kg.No further regulatory actions are required from our point of view.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|