|
It was reported that occlusion occurred, requiring additional intervention.The subject underwent treatment with the ranger drug coated balloon and eluvia drug eluting stent on (b)(6) 2025 as a part of the clinical trial.The subject underwent treatment with the ranger drug coated balloon and eluvia drug eluting stent on (b)(6) 2025 as a part of a clinical trial.The target lesion #001 was in the left proximal superficial femoral artery, left mid superficial femoral artery extending up to left distal superficial femoral artery with 6 mm proximal reference vessel diameter and 6 mm distal reference vessel diameter with 175 mm lesion length with 100% stenosis and was classified as transatlantic intersociety consensus (tasc) ii c lesion.Prior to the target lesion treatment with the study device, lithotripsy was performed using 6 mm x 80 mm shockwave e8 ivl lithotripasy device and pre-dilation was performed using 6 mm x 200 mm sterling otw pta balloon.Treatment of target lesion was performed by dilation using 6 mm x 200 mm ranger drug-coated balloon study device and placement of 6 mm x 60 mm and 6 mm x 150 mm eluvia drug-eluting stent, study devices.Following post dilation was performed by using 6 mm x 60 mm sterling otw pta balloon.The final residual stenosis was noted to be 5%.On (b)(6) 2025, the subject was discharged from the hospital on dual antiplatelet therapy.On (b)(6) 2026, the subject was noted with symptoms related to peripheral vascular disease.On (b)(6) 2026, 533 days post index procedure, occlusion noted in left proximal superficial femoral artery and left mid superficial femoral artery was revascularized by performing balloon angioplasty using 6 mm x 200 mm and 6 mm x 60 mm ranger drug coated balloons and placement of 6 mm x 100 mm and 6 mm x 60 mm eluvia drug eluting stents.The final residual stenosis was noted to be 10%.On the same day, the event was considered to be resolved.
|
|
A2 - age at time of event: 48 years old at the time of study enrollment
investigation results:
device history record (dhr) review:
the device history record review confirmed that the device met all material, assembly, and performance specifications prior to distribution.Labeling review:
review of the instructions for use (ifu) confirmed there was relevant content and sufficient guidance with respect to the circumstances described within this complaint.No updates are required to the ifu as a result of this event.Risk review:
a risk review performed for the eluvia device confirmed that the reported event is a known event defined in the product's risk management documentation.This event type has been accounted for during product risk analysis to support acceptable risk benefits for the product.Investigation conclusion:
based on a thorough review of the reported complaint, boston scientific has assigned an investigation conclusion code of adverse event related to patient condition.
|