|
|
| Model Number |
CA461TS |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Degraded (1153)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
09/24/2026
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
A device was returned to a third-party service center in reference to the voluntary field safety notice/recall notification related to the sound abatement foam in certain cpap, bipap, and mechanical ventilator devices.The device was not in patient use.During the evaluation of the device, the third-party service center visually inspected the device and found evidence of foam degradation and an unspecified fluid contamination.Additionally, the evaluation of the device data identified unrelated error codes.These error codes are consistent with normal device operation and expected use conditions and are not considered reportable under medical device reporting requirements.No evidence was identified to suggest that these error codes contributed to or caused the reported event.The device has been scrapped.At this time, no further investigation can be performed.If any additional information is received, a follow up report will be filed.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The affected products with field complaints alleging pe-pur foam degradation have undergone the establishment of complaint codes specifically identifying foam degradation, for system one.A field correction action(2021-06-a) was initiated, and medical device recall letters were issued.A field action was initiated to replace pe-pur foam in affected products; degradation was added to the respective dfmeas and the risk management file ¿ (b)(4) (systemone) was updated to include hazards associated with foam degradation based on complaints analyzed through various health hazard evaluations (hhes).Risk tags ¿ degradation01, toxic02 and particulate01 reflect the safety risk of design containing the pe-pur foam.These complaints were monitored and trended in accordance with the complaint trending procedures.If the complaints were determined to meet the criteria for escalation, they were escalated for risk assessment through the post market clinical escalation process.As of the date of submission for this report, there is no indication that complaints for the failure in question have led to unacceptable levels of severity or probabilities of harm, and therefore no further action will be pursued.Dhr review was performed for the complaint device sn.Review confirms that the device met the final acceptance criteria and was released for final distribution.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|