|
The patient reported a stitch was eroding from the implant site.The patient went to the hospital due to pain at the suture site and was given guidance on how to move forward with imaging.On (b)(6) 2026, x-rays were performed, migration was not suspected, and it was noted the patient did not have stiches poking through their skin.However, the patient had bulging at the pocket site where the coils and stitches were.A revision procedure was performed where the physician buried the stitches and coil deeper under the skin to reduce patient discomfort.No further issues have been reported.
|
|
The surgical issue questionnaire was reviewed for potential causes of the reported issue.Based on this review, implanting the device off-label, not performing an x-ray immediately after the procedure to confirm device placement, inadequate fixation, the patient having recently gone through an mri, implanting the device after the expiration date, not prepping the surface of the skin with an antiseptic solution, using incorrect tools, and not prescribing antibiotics pre-operatively have been ruled out.Other potential causes of the reported issue include severe force applied to the implant and excessive twisting or stretching.A curonix representative conducted a review of sterilization and packaging records for the respective product lot; curonix has confirmed that the product was delivered sterile, validated sterilization parameters were used, and sterile barriers were verified to be intact following packaging.The stimulator is used to treat pain.The cause of the reported issue is unknown.The investigation findings do not lead to a clear conclusion about the cause of the reported issue.Therefore, conclusion has been selected as unable to determine root cause.Rates reviewed at the most recent complaint trending meeting do not indicate a significant increase in surgical issues.Surgical issue rates remain acceptably low; thus, a capa is not required at this time.Surgical issue rates will continue to be tracked and trended.
|