|
The manufacturer was notified of a pacemaker implant involving a perceval plus heart valve through mantra study.Based on the information available, on (b)(6) 2026, a perceval plus heart valve size xl was implanted in a patient.On (b)(6)2026 , the patient experienced complete atrioventricular block.As such, a decision was made on (b)(6) 2026 to implant a permanent pacemaker.This procedure was done on (b)(6) 2026.The outcome has been reported as recovered/resolved w.Sequelae.The patient's clinical history included: coronary artery disease; diabetes mellitus: type ii, non-insulin dependent; dyslipidemia; systemic hypertension; tobacco history: previous; other disease: iron-deficiency anemia, chronic pancreatitis, moderate pericardial effusion; and nyha class ii.
|
|
The manufacturing and material records for the device involved in this event, as they pertain to the reported issue, were retrieved and reviewed by the manufacturer¿s quality engineering.The results confirmed that this prosthesis satisfied all required material, visual, and performance standards at the time of manufacture and release.From the document review performed, no manufacturing deficiencies were noted.Conduction disorders are common in patients with aortic valve diseases.As a result, it is common for patients to receive permanent pacemaker implantation after aortic valve replacement.Risk factors include preexisting conducting disease and preoperative aortic regurgitation.This event is, therefore, a known, inherent risk of the procedure, and it is listed among the potential adverse events in the perceval plus ifu.Should further information be received in the future, a follow up report will be provided.
|