|
Per information provided:
on (b)(6) 2005 - patient was diagnosed with bilateral inguinal hernia thereby underwent open repair with implant of perfix plug (device 1 ¿ left and device 2 ¿ right).Per operative notes, ¿a transverse supraumbilical incision was made on both sides and carried down to the subcutaneous tissue.On the left side of the inguinal region a hernia sac was identified, which was removed.A perfix plug (device 1) was placed into the right inguinal region and secured it with sutures.Another incision was made into the right side of the inguinal region.There was a hernia sac identified.The hernia sac was dissected out.A perfix plug (device 2) was placed into the right inguinal floor and secured it with sutures.¿
on (b)(6) 2013 - patient was diagnosed with bilateral inguinal hernia, adhesion thereby underwent laparoscopic repair with implant of synthetic mesh.Per operative notes, ¿an incision was made into the inguinal region through previous incision site.There were direct inguinal hernias which were both recurrences, as previously placed perfix plug (device 1 and 2) was identified.During right-sided dissection, the perfix plug (device 2) was adhered to the peritoneum, resulting in a small peritoneal tear that was closed with clips.Both hernia sacs were taken down.A synthetic mesh was placed onto the field to cover the full defect and secured it with sutures.¿.
|
|
Root cause is inconclusive; no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.This mdr represents the perfix plug (device 2).An additional supplemental emdr was submitted to represent the perfix plug (device 1).Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|