• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MAKO SURGICAL CORP. ANSPACH EMAX 2 PLUS BURR MOTOR; STEREOTACTIC DEVICE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MAKO SURGICAL CORP. ANSPACH EMAX 2 PLUS BURR MOTOR; STEREOTACTIC DEVICE Back to Search Results
Model Number N/A
Device Problems Failure to Fire (2610); Temperature Problem (3022)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 09/15/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
As part of normal complaint follow-up, an evaluation of the event has been initiated by mako surgical.A supplemental report will be submitted when additional information becomes available.
 
Event Description
The surgeon was performing a partial knee arthroplasty using the robotic arm interactive orthopedic system (rio).During the case the anspach burr motor malfunctioned.The anspach motor was exchanged with a replacement anspach motor, which then also malfunctioned.The motor was exchanged for a third replacement motor.The case was then completed successfully.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Follow-up #1 and final report submitted to update sections based on the results of investigation.Reported event: anspach emax 2 plus burr motor went down during a case.Method & results: device evaluation and results: device evaluation was performed and the anspach emax 2 plus burr motor event was confirmed.Device history review: not performed as the anspach emax 2 plus burr motor is an oem product.Complaint history review: based on the device identification, the catsweb and trackwise complaint databases were reviewed from 2011 to present for similar reported events regarding went down during a case failure of p/n: 110940, s/n: (b)(4).There have been no other events for the referenced serial number.Trend request for this part number has been submitted (trend request (b)(4)).Conclusions: the anspach emax 2 plus burr motor is an oem device.Upon receipt, the device was evaluated per (b)(4) anspach emax 2 plus burr motor and the reported event was confirmed.
 
Event Description
The surgeon was performing a partial knee arthroplasty using the robotic arm interactive orthopedic system (rio).During the case the anspach burr motor malfunctioned.The anspach motor was exchanged with a replacement anspach motor, which then also malfunctioned.The motor was exchanged for a third replacement motor.The case was then completed successfully.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ANSPACH EMAX 2 PLUS BURR MOTOR
Type of Device
STEREOTACTIC DEVICE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MAKO SURGICAL CORP.
2555 davie road
fort lauderdale FL 33317
Manufacturer (Section G)
MAKO SURGICAL CORP.
2555 davie road
fort lauderdale FL 33317
Manufacturer Contact
jonathan reeves
2555 davie road
fort lauderdale, FL 33317
9546280700
MDR Report Key5097854
MDR Text Key26547587
Report Number3005985723-2015-00170
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OLO
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K112507
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Followup
Report Date 09/16/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/23/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberN/A
Device Catalogue Number110940
Device Lot NumberN/A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received09/16/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age71 YR
-
-