A continuous cycling peritoneal dialysis (ccpd) patient's caregiver called technical support, to request a replacement cycler due to continued/repeated cycler alarms.Upon follow up w/the patient's pd nurse, she stated that she was aware of the patient's continued cycler issues and the many replacement devices.As a result of the constant issues and the patient's inability to complete multiple treatments, he was hospitalized from (b)(6) 2015 for fluid overload.He was returned to the ccpd program.The patient's medical records were requested.
|
Based on the 11 pages of medical records information, it appears that this (b)(6) male patient was admitted to the hospital on (b)(6) 2015, with chief complaints of cough, shortness of breath, and fever.A review of medical records showed the patient had complaints of technical difficulties with his cycler where several treatments were not completed due to cycler alarms, there is no documentation stating that continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (capd) was performed, and the patient experienced an episode of fluid volume overload.During the admission on (b)(6) 2015, the patient was diagnosed with pneumonia and experienced rapid atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response, a diltiazem drip was initiated, and the patient was admitted to a telemetry unit.On (b)(6) 2015, the patient was discharged from the hospital to home, amiodarone 200mg daily and coumadin (warfarin) was prescribed, the patient is in stable condition, and the patient continues ccpd therapy.There is no documentation in the medical record supporting a possible association between the use of delflex pd solutions, the liberty cycler, and the events of fluid volume over load, atrial fibrillation, and pneumonia.The actual device was returned to the manufacturer for physical: external visual inspection showed no indications of dried fluid within the cassette compartment or underneath the mushroom heads.The exterior showed no signs of any physical damage.The heater tray/scale was not obstructed.A simulated treatment was performed using the received cycler, and there were no alarms or problems that occurred during testing.There were no fluid leaks in the test cassette during the treatment test.The valve actuation test and system air leak test passed.Internal inspection showed indications of dried fluid on the bottom cover between the front panel and the pump assembly.The cause of the encountered dried fluid could not be determined.The mushroom head check passed.A device manufacturing record review was conducted and confirmed there were no deviations or non-conformances during the manufacturing process.Product labeling, material, and process controls were within specifications.
|