The aptus applier was selected for prophylactic treatment.It was reported that during the index procedure, upon deployment of the first aptus endoanchor in the distal arch, the endoanchor came loose.The physician was able to snare the endoanchor and remove it from the patient.The diameter of the proximal landing zone was 40-42mm.No further treatment was performed and the patient did not have any complications.No additional clinical sequelae were reported and the patient is fine.
|
Evaluation of the returned device has been completed.The exact cause of the mis-deployed endoanchor cannot be definitely determined although the deformation suggests the endoanchor encountered significant resistance during deployment.Based on historical analysis of similar complaints, there is no evidence of a material defect that would have been contributory to the deformation.Conditions that have historically been identified as causes of deployment resistance include: positioning of the heli-fx applier at an angle relative to the vessel wall during deployment, endograft/cuff material infolding or oversizing, and calcification in the area of deployment as well as not maintaining adequate pressure/apposition during deployment.If the heli-fx applier is not positioned perpendicular to the vessel wall with sufficient forward pressure and proper apposition or in an area of calcium or highly concentrated or loose endograft/cuff material, it increases the likelihood the endoanchor will encounter resistance as it is deployed.The excess torque is transmitted directly to the endoanchor leading to its deformation.
|