• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-LIMERICK HYDROSET INJECTABLE CEMENT KIT 5CC; IMPLANT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-LIMERICK HYDROSET INJECTABLE CEMENT KIT 5CC; IMPLANT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 397005
Device Problem Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
Patient Problem No Information (3190)
Event Date 10/16/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Device is not available for evaluation.If additional information is received it will be reported on a supplemental report.Device discarded at hospital.
 
Event Description
A company representative reported that during a mpj revision surgery, the doctor resected bad bone and wanted to use hydroset as bone void filler.The hydroset was mixed correctly but never set up or hardened.It was very watery and over 12 mins after implanting it began to crumble when slightly touched.Subsequently, no hardware could be put through the hyrdoset.The first box of hydroset used was taken out of the patient and the next box opened.The same issues happened with the second box.Both boxes were not expired.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The reported event could not be confirmed because the complained devices were not returned.The investigation conducted is based on the test of the retain samples and the reviews of the batch manufacturing records (bmr).The devices were manufactured by stryker (b)(4).So the complaint information was forwarded to the manufacturing facility.Final functional testing was performed prior to releasing batches (b)(4), all testing was within specification and met the functional testing acceptance criteria.The reviews of the bmr were completed and no discrepancies were recorded.It has been confirmed that the products and their components (liquid and powder components) were manufactured per validated conditions.Both retain samples from final lots (b)(4) were tested using the hydroset wet field set penetration test.The tests were passed.Based on investigation and statistical evaluation there is no indication for any systematic design, material or manufacturing related issue.The complaint is added to the complaint trend.
 
Event Description
A company representative reported that during a mpj revision surgery, the doctor resected bad bone and wanted to use hydroset as bone void filler.The hydroset was mixed correctly but never set up or hardened.It was very watery and over 12 mins after implanting it began to crumble when slightly touched.Subsequently, no hardware could be put through the hyrdoset.The first box of hydroset used was taken out of the patient and the next box opened.The same issues happened with the second box.Both boxes were not expired.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
HYDROSET INJECTABLE CEMENT KIT 5CC
Type of Device
IMPLANT
Manufacturer (Section D)
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-LIMERICK
raheen business park
limerick D-791 11
Manufacturer (Section G)
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-LIMERICK
raheen business park
limerick NA
Manufacturer Contact
jonathan schell
boetzingerstr. 41
freiburg D-791-11
76145120
MDR Report Key5216909
MDR Text Key30991410
Report Number0008010177-2015-00297
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GXP
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K060763
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/16/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number397005
Device Lot NumberT75S9IC02059
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/16/2015
Initial Date FDA Received11/11/2015
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/21/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age90 YR
-
-