• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. DENALI FEMORAL SYSTEM; VENA CAVA FILTER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. DENALI FEMORAL SYSTEM; VENA CAVA FILTER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number DL900F
Device Problems Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem (2906); Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 11/06/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
No hospital/medical records or medical images have been made available to the manufacturer.As the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The device has been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.
 
Event Description
It was reported that during a vena cava filter deployment procedure, during deployment the last two filter legs remained inside the deployment sheath.A.035 guidewire was used to complete the deployment of the filter; however, the filter and guidewire became tangled together.Access was gained in the jugular vein as a snare device was used to capture and retrieve the vena cava filter without incident.Another filter was prepped and deployed successfully.There was no reported patient injury.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A further clinical review of the event details on (b)(6) 2015 has been completed and identified a change in the mdr reportability.This event is reportable as a malfunction mdr, while a partial deployment of an inferior vena cava filter required procedural improvisation by the medical professional, there was no patient injury or adverse patient outcome.: mdr classification; type of reportable event.Outcomes attributed to adverse event.The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed with special attention to the raw materials, subassemblies, manufacturing process and quality control testing.This lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.This is the only event reported to date for this lot number and failure mode.Visual inspection: the filter is partially retraced within a recovery cone removal system.This is against the instructions for use (ifu), as the denali filter should only be retrieved using a dual sheath snare device.The shaft handle of the recovery cone was bent and the proximal portion of the sheath (near the strain relief) appeared to be slightly bunched or crinkled.There was no alleged deficiency with the recovery cone and the damage may have occurred after the procedure or during packaging for return.The distal tip of the recovery cone sheath was flared.Functional/performance evaluation: the denali filter was removed from the recovery cone.All 6 arms and 6 legs were present and intact.Two legs and one arm were crossed.No crossed limbs were reported by the user.It is possible the limbs became crossed during retraction into the sheath.The polyurethane cone was separated from one of the prongs.Dimensional evaluation: the limbs were uncrossed.Heat was applied and the filter took the appropriate shape.All measurements met the required specifications.Medical records/image/photo review: no medical records or medical images have been made available to the manufacturer.Conclusion: the denali filter was returned partially retracted within a recovery cone removal system.As neither images or cine runs were provided, the investigation is inconclusive for partial deployment.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause for this event is unknown.It is unknown if procedural factors contributed to this event.It should be noted that per the instructions for use (ifu), the denali filter should be retrieved using an intravascular snare only.The filter was removed using a recovery cone which is only intended for use with the g2 x filter, g2 express filter, g2 filter and recovery filter.Labeling review: the denali femoral system instructions for use (ifu) provides general instructions for use of the device, as well as warnings, precautions, and potential complications associated with the device.The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
DENALI FEMORAL SYSTEM
Type of Device
VENA CAVA FILTER
Manufacturer (Section D)
BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC.
1625 west 3rd st.
tempe AZ 85281
Manufacturer (Section G)
C.R. BARD, INC. (GFO)
289 bay road
queensbury NY 12804
Manufacturer Contact
judith ludwig
1625 west 3rd st.
tempe, AZ 85281
4803032689
MDR Report Key5271745
MDR Text Key32858466
Report Number2020394-2015-01974
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DTK
UDI-Device Identifier00801741040801
UDI-Public(01)00801741040801(17)180831(10)GFZG3076
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K130366
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 11/11/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/31/2018
Device Catalogue NumberDL900F
Device Lot NumberGFZG3076
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/23/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/11/2015
Initial Date FDA Received12/07/2015
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Not provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received01/11/2016
03/10/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/12/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age60 YR
Patient Weight82
-
-