• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - MAPLE GROVE STINGRAY CATHETER; CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - MAPLE GROVE STINGRAY CATHETER; CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS Back to Search Results
Model Number H749M1000B0
Device Problem Material Rupture (1546)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 12/02/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).
 
Event Description
Same case as: 2134265-2015-08983.It was reported that balloon catheter burst occurred.The chronic totally occluded (cto) target lesion was located in the left anterior descending (lad) artery.A stingray catheter was used in conjunction with a stingray guidewire and a crossboss catheter to treat the target lesion.The physician utilized the three devices for an antegrade dissection re-entry method in crossing the cto lesion.When the physician successfully crossed the lesion with an unspecified cto specialty gudiewire and then established the guidewire in the sub-intimal plane as visible through fluoroscopy injections, the physician passed the crossboss catheter down over the guidewire while remaining in the sub-intimal plane.After which, the physician took the first stingray catheter along with the stingray guidewire and brought the devices into the sub-intimal plane.The physician then inflated the stingray catheter at 4 atmospheres (atm) however, it was noticed that the balloon burst.The stingray catheter was then pulled and the second stingray catheter was used and successfully delivered to the desired location.Upon inflation of the second stingray catheter at 4 atm, the device stayed inflated for a short duration just enough to deliver and cross the stingray guidewire.However, it was unable to retain the contrast since the device burst as well.Subsequently, since the stingray guidewire was able to re-enter the true lumen, the physician proceed in delivering the unspecified stents across the lesion and re-vascularized the artery.No patient complications were reported and the patient's status is stable.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluated by mfr: the device was returned for evaluation.Microscopic examination of the balloon revealed no damage.Functional testing was performed by attaching an inflation device filled with water to the device.When positive pressure was applied, a stream of water emitted from the guidewire lumen.There was a hole in the inner lumen 20mm from the proximal weld.The hole is consistent with a guidewire puncture.Microscopic examination presented no irregularities in the shaft material that could have contributed to the damage.The shaft was kinked 2.45cm from the hub.Inspection of the remainder of the device, apart from the observed damage, revealed no other damage or irregularities.The manufacturing batch record review confirmed that the device met all material, assembly and performance specifications.The most probable root cause is operational context as device performance was limited due to anatomical procedural factors.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
Same case as: 2134265-2015-08983.It was reported that balloon catheter burst occurred.The chronic totally occluded (cto) target lesion was located in the left anterior descending (lad) artery.A stingray catheter was used in conjunction with a stingray guidewire and a crossboss catheter to treat the target lesion.The physician utilized the three devices for an antegrade dissection re-entry method in crossing the cto lesion.When the physician successfully crossed the lesion with an unspecified cto specialty guidewire and then established the guidewire in the sub-intimal plane as visible through fluoroscopy injections, the physician passed the crossboss catheter down over the guidewire while remaining in the sub-intimal plane.After which, the physician took the first stingray catheter along with the stingray guidewire and brought the devices into the sub-intimal plane.The physician then inflated the stingray catheter at 4 atmospheres (atm) however, it was noticed that the balloon burst.The stingray catheter was then pulled and the second stingray catheter was used and successfully delivered to the desired location.Upon inflation of the second stingray catheter at 4 atm, the device stayed inflated for a short duration just enough to deliver and cross the stingray guidewire.However, it was unable to retain the contrast since the device burst as well.Subsequently, since the stingray guidewire was able to re-enter the true lumen, the physician proceed in delivering the unspecified stents across the lesion and re-vascularized the artery.No patient complications were reported and the patient's status is stable.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
STINGRAY CATHETER
Type of Device
CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - MAPLE GROVE
one scimed place
maple grove MN 55311
Manufacturer Contact
linda leimer
one scimed place
maple grove, MN 55311
7634941700
MDR Report Key5318007
MDR Text Key34127068
Report Number2134265-2015-08982
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DQY
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGB
PMA/PMN Number
K080987
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/02/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/22/2016
Device Model NumberH749M1000B0
Device Catalogue NumberM-1000
Device Lot Number17145411
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/04/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/02/2015
Initial Date FDA Received12/22/2015
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received02/10/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/23/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age63 YR
-
-