• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MAQUET CV 8 MM 40CM HEMASHIELD MDV; GRAFT, VASCULAR, SYNTHETIC/BIOLOGIC COMPOSITE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MAQUET CV 8 MM 40CM HEMASHIELD MDV; GRAFT, VASCULAR, SYNTHETIC/BIOLOGIC COMPOSITE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number VS020953080
Device Problem Fluid/Blood Leak (1250)
Patient Problem No Information (3190)
Event Date 11/30/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(6).The device has been returned to the factory and is being evaluated.A supplemental report will be submitted when the evaluation is completed.A lot history record review was completed for the reported product lot number.There was no nonconformance recorded in the lot history.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
As done in the past, dr.Alain verdant used an hemashield gold 8mm x 40cm to make a cannulation of the femoral and when under pump, the blood leaked through all the wall of the graft, which did not happen in the past.So the graft was not used as an implant but as a perfusion entry.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).The graft segment was returned to the factory for evaluation.The entire body of the graft was saturated with blood which had dried into the material of the graft.It is not possible to return the graft to its blood-free state without compromising the integrity of the graft.Due to the returned state of the graft, we are unable to evaluate the graft to confirm the reported complaint because the graft segment was returned in a condition precluding proper evaluation with respect to the reported failure mode ¿leak¿.Therefore, a review of the manufacturing processes was performed.The hemashield gold knitted microvel® double velour vascular graft is impregnated with collagen to improve hemostasis.The device history record (dhr) has been reviewed with special focus on the results of the standard porosity testing performed during final inspection.The records show the device lot conformed to all applicable procedures and specifications.Specifically, the lot passed porosity testing with all permeability values within specification.The test results are available as an attachment to the investigation record.The usage of a graft for temporary bypass represents technically an off-label usage.The blood loss due to the phenomenon described above should not be clinically significant and should not require blood transfusion.
 
Event Description
As done in the past, dr.(b)(6) used an hemashield gold 8mm x 40cm to make a cannulation of the femoral and when under pump, the blood leaked through all the wall of the graft, which did not happen in the past.So the graft was not used as an implant but as a perfusion entry.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
8 MM 40CM HEMASHIELD MDV
Type of Device
GRAFT, VASCULAR, SYNTHETIC/BIOLOGIC COMPOSITE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MAQUET CV
45 barbour pond drive
wayne NJ 07470
Manufacturer (Section G)
MAQUET CV
45 barbour pond drive
wayne NJ 07470
Manufacturer Contact
45 barbour pond drive
wayne, NJ 07470
MDR Report Key5329992
MDR Text Key34484206
Report Number2242352-2015-01411
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MAL
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCA
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/01/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/28/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/31/2019
Device Catalogue NumberVS020953080
Device Lot Number25106693
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/14/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received03/24/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Date Device Manufactured11/07/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-