Review of the manufacturing and inspection records revealed no discrepancies.The item returned was documented as faultless prior to distribution.During investigation no material, design or manufacturing related issues were found.The returned nail adapter was fully functional.Review of complaint history, capa databases and risk analysis did not identify any conspicuity.The review of the risk assessment for the failure mode indicated the matter was addressed adequately.There are no actions in place related to the reported event for the subject product.No non-conformity was identified.According to received information the drill broke during the drilling process.The event description described the situation ¿it was not possible to screw the tibial nail at the proximal area.The nail holding must be twisted since i broke the drill by screwing at the proximal area.¿ the connection ¿ seated by a mating pegs / slots - between nail and nail adapter is secured by a nail holding screw.According to above statement it could be suggested that the nail holding screw could not be engaged correctly into the nail¿s thread.This is usually caused when the pegs and slots are not correctly engaged ¿ e.G.May have become loose during the insertion procedure.The loosening was obviously observed after starting drilling resulting in the attempt to ¿re-tighten¿ the construct with the drill still engaged in the nail.Consequently, due to axial loading (screwing) and rigid connection (drill in nail¿s drill hole) the drill broke inside the patient.The labelling points out to ¿repeatedly check that the connections between the instruments or between implants and instruments required for the precise positioning and fixing are secure.¿ however it cannot be excluded that the drill had been pre-damaged during former surgeries, but the damage should then have been detected during inspection prior to surgery and another device would have been used.The labelling points out that damage have to be avoided.Based on the above facts it was concluded that the root cause was not related to a deficiency of the device, because fully functional, but was rather linked to an inadequate handling by the user.In case relevant information becomes available we reserve the right to update the investigation and to change the root cause.The event was not caused by a deficiency of the device.
|