CAREFUSION RESUS, INF W/MASK, LRG TBG, P/O, 6/CS; CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION AID KIT
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number 2K8019 |
Device Problem
Break (1069)
|
Patient Problem
No Code Available (3191)
|
Event Date 01/12/2016 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Initial emdr submission- patient demographics such as age, dob, gender and weight were not provided by the customer.The sample was received and decontaminated on (b)(6) 2016.This sample is now in route to our quality engineers at our manufacturing facility who will perform the full investigation.Once the investigation is complete a follow up emdr submission will be provided.The customer is unable to provide any additional information regarding the patient¿s condition at this time.
|
|
Event Description
|
Customer reported via email: ¿the manometer port is broken.¿ on (b)(6) 2016, customer provided additional information stating "the resus bag was used during an actual code.No, the product was not noticed of its impairment upon removing from the bag.Once the respiratory therapist entered, she noticed the manometer valve was missing (it was in the bag).The patient did end up being intubated.So, yes, the patient continued to decline while the broken resus bag was used".Customer states sample will be sent in."once the valve was noticed, another resus bag was provided.The piece is actually "broke".The plastic is broken.The valve comes already attached to the resus bag.The patient is still intubated and had to be transferred to musc¿.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4) follow up emdr-one opened sample was received and the failure mode could be confirmed, the component (b)(4) was broken.The sample component was submitted for an ir (infrared spectroscopy) scan.This scan allows us to evaluate for any other characteristic that would cause the broken condition.The results of the scan were considered acceptable and no issues were found that would have contributed to this issue from the manufacturing stand point.The device history record for the finished good lot reported was reviewed for any issues related with this customer report and no issues were found.Two years of complaints were reviewed from march 1, 2014 ¿ february 29, 2016 and no trend was observed in the past six months.Based on the investigation, it is not possible to determine a root cause, since there is no evidence that the broken piece occurred during the manufacturing process.This may have happened outside the manufacturing process.Manufacturing personnel were notified regarding this issue, no further actions will be implemented as it is considered that this happened outside of the manufacturing facility.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This supplemental is being filed due to a retrospective review of mdr submissions.Corrections and additional information has been completed.(b)(4).
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|