Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.Additional narrative: patient information was not provided by reporter.Device is an instrument and is not implanted/explanted.The subject device is expected to be returned to the synthes manufacturer for evaluation.A device history record review was performed for the subject device lot.The review showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.No non-conformances were generated during the production of the subject device.The investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
Device investigation summary - the returned 357.371 lot number 7506796 buttress/compression nut and the 357.366 lot number 1870340 aiming arm show some markings and signs of wear although nothing that would impair their function.The devices function together as designed.A visual inspection, dimensional inspection, drawing review, and dhr review were performed as part of this investigation.No product design issues or discrepancies were observed, and therefore review to the applicable dcrm is not required.The cause of this complaint condition cannot be determined.The devices were reported to have repeatedly come apart during surgery.This complaint is unconfirmed.The complaint condition cannot be replicated.When tested with a sample 357.369 blade guide sleeve, the devices easily assemble and do not come apart even when subjected to a moderate amount of force.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|