|
During a pta, axillary vein procedure on the female patient, the user inflated the balloon; however, it burst at 14 atm.As the distal portion of the balloon catheter ruptured within the body of the patient; a snare was used to retrieve the remaining portion.No adverse consequence to the patient reported.
|
|
(b)(4).Investigation - evaluation.A review of complaint history, trends, visual inspection of the returned device, instructions for use (ifu), and quality control was conducted during the investigation.Visual inspection of the returned device noted the following : the one used and damaged pta balloon was returned in two separate pieces.The proximal balloon showed evidence of a circumferential tear and the distal balloon showed evidence of a linear and a circumferential tear.Based on measurements, it is believed that the balloon is present in its entirety.The tubing underneath the balloon was severely stretched measuring a total of 13.3 cm, indicating that it had stretched approximately 7.3 cm.A review of this lot determined no other complaints reported on this lot.Neither were there any non-conformances noted on this lot or the balloon subassembly during product manufacturing.The nominal pressure for this device is 10 atm, and the rated burst pressure is 15 atm.The user reported that the balloon burst at 14 atm, therefore over-inflation is not suspected to have caused the balloon to burst.It is unknown if a sheath was used with this device.The device is compatible with a 5 fr sheath.After balloon rupture, balloon rewrap becomes more difficult as the balloon cannot fully deflate.Attempted withdrawal through a sheath may increase the difficulty of balloon rewrap and can contribute to increased resistance and subsequently to separation.The device is shipped with an instruction for use (ifu) that describes the intended use, specific items are addressed such as: if a balloon rupture occurs, the device is to be withdrawn with a sheath as a unit.The device is designed to burst linearly.A balloon may burst or tear circumferentially due to angulation or calcification.Calcifications can have unexpected sharp protrusions which can damage the balloon and contribute to burst or tear.The user did report calcification, but it is unknown if this played a role in the rupture or in a tear of the balloon.After rupture, attempted removal through an introducer/sheath (against the ifu) would be difficult as the balloon cannot be fully deflated, making rewrap more difficult on a balloon.A balloon that burst circumferentially has an even more difficult time with rewrap, which increases the potential for separation.If the user attempted withdrawal through the sheath, it could have contributed to resistance and stretching of the catheter.Based on the information provided and the results of our investigation, a definitive root cause for the rupture and separation cannot be determined.The user was able to retrieve the separated portion using a snare.The appropriate internal personnel have been notified and we will continue to monitor for similar complaints.Per the quality engineering risk assessment (qera) no further action is required.
|
|
During a pta, axillary vein procedure on the female patient, the user inflated the balloon; however, it burst at 14 atm.As the distal portion of the balloon catheter ruptured within the body of the patient; a snare was used to retrieve the remaining portion.No adverse consequence to the patient reported.
|