This follow-up report is being filed to relay additional information, which was unknown at the time of the initial medwatch.Updated 510(k): k063251.No device was returned; the photograph of the explanted devices are intact and do not show signs of significant wear.Dhr review shows no deviations or anomalies in the manufacturing process.The reported devices are used for treatment.Review of the complaint history identified no additional complaints for the part and lot combination.It was confirmed that the device was used in an approved and compatible combination.Returned operative notes state that the original hip implant surgery was performed without complication.Patient is stated to have a high activity level.Adherence to rehabilitation protocol is not known.Patient is stated to have excellent bone quality.X-rays were reviewed during a follow up visit, and a periprosthetic proximal femur fracture was noted that has led to implant loosening.There is also a small piece of bone around the tibial tubercle.Patient fell on their right knee, and their healthcare professional states they suffered a patella tendon tear.They did not complaint of pain in the hip, however pain was stated to be severe with range of motion.With the information presented, the root cause for the reported periprosthetic fracture is due to patient injury from falling.
|