• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AV-TEMECULA-CT ARMADA 35 PTA CATHETER; PERIPHERAL DILATATION CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AV-TEMECULA-CT ARMADA 35 PTA CATHETER; PERIPHERAL DILATATION CATHETER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number B2040-040
Device Problems Difficult To Position (1467); Difficult to Remove (1528)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 01/25/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.Concomitant medical products: guide wire: terumo stiff 0.35 (x2), sheath: cook flexor 6f 55cm.The device was received.Investigation is not yet complete.A follow up report will be submitted with all relevant information.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the procedure was to treat a de novo lesion in the proximal left superficial femoral artery (sfa) that was occluded for 5 cm after the ostium.The vessel was also heavily calcified.A non-abbott guide wire was angled and positioned.There was no device issues noted during prep of the armada 35 4 x 40 mm balloon catheter.Once inside the patient, the armada balloon had difficulty advancing on the guide wire and would not advance any further.It was also very difficult to remove the guide wire from the balloon lumen for exchange.Another non-abbott guide wire was then advanced in the balloon lumen with the same resistance felt.The balloon was ultimately removed and a non-abbott balloon was then advanced on the same guide wire without any resistance.The procedure was successfully completed.There were no adverse effects and no clinically significant delay.No additional information was provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Evaluation summary: (b)(4).The device was returned for evaluation and the reported resistance was unable to be confirmed.Based on visual, dimensional, and functional analysis of the returned device, there is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design, or labeling.A conclusive cause for the reported resistance could not be determined.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other incidents from this lot.Based on the reviewed information, there is no indication the issue was caused by, or related to the design, manufacture or labeling of the device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ARMADA 35 PTA CATHETER
Type of Device
PERIPHERAL DILATATION CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
AV-TEMECULA-CT
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula CA 92591 4628
Manufacturer (Section G)
EL COYOL, COSTA RICA REG# 3009031392
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula CA 92591 4628
Manufacturer Contact
connie speck
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula, CA 92591-4628
9519143996
MDR Report Key5442369
MDR Text Key38704374
Report Number2024168-2016-00918
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LIT
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeFR
PMA/PMN Number
K111899
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Remedial Action Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/01/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/17/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/31/2019
Device Catalogue NumberB2040-040
Device Lot Number50820G1
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/11/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received02/29/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/01/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age96 YR
-
-