Sample was returned for evaluation.It was determined that the unit was not properly orientated when assembled.The slit mesh (positioning pocket created during manufacturing) was on the bottom and the mesh layer on the top was not open.We have concluded that this problem was caused by an operator error.Per manufacturing process requirement the positioning pocket should have been placed on the top and the non-slit mesh on the bottom.By altering the mesh as the surgeon did he inadvertently weakened the device and compromised its effectiveness.The warning section of the ifu states, "do not cut or reshape the ventrio¿ hernia patch, as this could affect its effectiveness.¿ regarding fixation the ifu states, "davol fixation devices and/or non-absorbable monofilament sutures are recommended to properly secure the prosthesis.If other fixation devices are used, they must be indicated for use in hernia repair.Care should be taken to ensure that the patch is adequately fixated to the abdominal wall.If necessary, additional fasteners and / or sutures should be used." while the device was compromised by the alteration by the user this does not appear to have caused the post-op complications that were related to the patient's recurrent hernia.The recurrence was reported to have been caused by the surgeon being unable to adequately fixate the mesh due to the patient¿s anatomy and that the mesh used being undersized to the hernia defect.This mdr represents the manufacturing deficiency noted during the sample evaluation.A separate mdr (1213643-2015-00432) was previously sent to report the unrelated post operative recurrence.The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.
|