• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC PIPELINE FLEX EMBOLIZATION DEVICE; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM FLOW DIVERTER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC PIPELINE FLEX EMBOLIZATION DEVICE; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM FLOW DIVERTER Back to Search Results
Model Number PED-500-20
Medical Device Problem Code Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Date of Event 02/03/2016
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The device was not returned as is remains in the patient; therefore, no definitive conclusion can be drawn regarding the clinical observation.However, based on the reported information, operator's technique contributed to the dislodged braid event.Per pipeline flex instruction for use: after the entire pipeline¿ flex embolization device is deployed, advance the micro catheter through the device making sure not to dislodge the braid.Information received from the same report as mdr mfr: 2029214-2016-00127.
 
Event or Problem Description
Medtronic received information that a pipeline flex was delivered and "jumped" down upon removing the microcatheter and a second pipeline flex did not open during treatment of an aneurysm located in the superior hypophyseal segment of the right internal carotid artery (ica).The aneurysm located just before the bifurcation of the middle cerebral artery (mca) and anterior cerebral artery (aca).The patient had moderate vessel tortuosity and received dual antiplatele treatment prior to procedure.It was reported that the landing vessel was tapered with distal diameter of 3.5mm and the proximal diameter 5.0 mm.The aneurysm max diameter was 10 mm and the neck width was 8 mm.The physician chose the device according to the large part of the proximal vessel.Physician planned to implant a ped-500-20, which was successfully implanted.The physician advanced the microcatheter through the device and captured the delivery wire with the microcatheter and removed it.However, when he removed the mirocatheter the device jumped down to the neck of the aneurysm.The physician then decided to implant another device ped-475-16 to the distal vessel to be able to cover the distal aneurysm neck.The physician passed the first device placed and attempted to deploy the second device however was unable to open the device as the middle distal part of the device did not open.The first landing zone was straight but the mid segment was a curve.The physician opened the device in a straight vessel and then continued to open during a curve.The device was deployed near to resheathing marker but the device stayed like a "sandwich." the physician tried to resheath and re-deploy several times but the device did not open.The device was resheathed within the marksman and removed together from the patient.The physician passed the first device again using another device ped-400-16 and was successfully implanted to the distal part and finish the case successfully.No patient injury was reported.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PIPELINE FLEX EMBOLIZATION DEVICE
Common Device Name
INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM FLOW DIVERTER
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC
9775 toledo way
irvine CA 92618
MDR Report Key5469856
Report Number2029214-2016-00128
Device Sequence Number11693471
Product Code OUT
Combination Product (Y/N)N
PMA/510(K) Number
P100018.S011
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source company representative,foreig
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 02/03/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Physician
Device Expiration Date07/25/2017
Device Model NumberPED-500-20
Device Lot Number9967350
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 02/03/2016
Initial Report FDA Received Date03/01/2016
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
-
-