Lab analysis confirmed an overflow lifting of material at the distal bond but remained intact to the device.Recurrence of the malfunction could result in a mild vessel injury (non-flow limiting dissection).No pre-op labs or testing performed.Patient's medical history or co-morbidities is unknown.This information was not available from the facility.Udi# (b)(4).The angiosculpt was returned intact to the introducer sheath.Visual examination found air present inside the distal portion of the balloon with the proximal portion of the balloon lodged inside the introducer sheath.One scoring element strut was lifted at the distal end with two scoring element struts bent and overlapped.The distal bond was damaged with material overflow lifting from the bond and the transition tubing was necked and severely stretched.During functional testing, the device was unable to be removed from the introducer sheath; therefore, the device was pulled distally to expose the proximal portion of the balloon with no issues noted.An indeflator was used to remove as much air as possible and even after manual manipulation to bring the balloon profile down, the device was still unable to be removed from the introducer sheath.Based on the lab analysis, it is probable the user applied some degree of force resulting in the damaged distal bond.Per the ifu, retained device component is listed as a possible adverse effect of the procedure.
|
The angiosculpt device could not be removed from the introducer sheath (6f cook) after use.The angiosculpt device, 0.014" guide wire, and introducer sheath were removed as a unit.Procedure was completed.Note: lab analysis confirmed an overflow lifting of material at the distal bond.
|