• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: HEART VALVES SANTA ANA RING TRI-AD 900SFC28; RING, ANNULOPLASTY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

HEART VALVES SANTA ANA RING TRI-AD 900SFC28; RING, ANNULOPLASTY Back to Search Results
Model Number 900SFC28
Device Problem Incomplete Coaptation (2507)
Patient Problem Tricuspid Regurgitation (2112)
Event Date 02/04/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Without the return of the product, no definitive conclusion can be made regarding the clinical observation.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
Medtronic received information that the patient presented with severe tricuspid regurgitation measured on echocardiogram, a dilated tricuspid annulus, extreme shortness of breath, an enlarged heart, and recent onset of rapid atrial fibrillation (afib).The physician noted that the patient had a very thin anterior leaflet, which was shorter than normal and likely contributed to the tricuspid regurgitation.The physician attempted to repair the native tricuspid valve with this annuloplasty ring.The physician placed the device with interrupted sutures and secured these with 2-0 ethibond sutures.The physician stated that this did not look good on a saline test and that there was leakage from redundant tissue on the posterior leaflet.The physician placed a 6-0 prolene suture on a cleft opposite the septal annulus.This improved coaptation, but there was still significant leakage.The physician explanted the device and closed the septal side with two pledgeted 4-0 sutures to create a bicuspid leaflet.Significant tricuspid regurgitation remained, so the physician successfully implanted a medtronic bioprosthetic valve in the tricuspid position.No further adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Added device manufacturing date.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Conclusion: investigation results indicated that there are times when a valve repair is attempted using an annuloplasty device and subsequent post repair evaluation demonstrates an inadequate result.This may likely be due to suboptimal anatomy, surgical technique or inappropriate sizing and not a malfunction of the annuloplasty ring.In this case, this event is attributed to the native valve being unrepairable as the surgical valve replacement was performed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RING TRI-AD 900SFC28
Type of Device
RING, ANNULOPLASTY
Manufacturer (Section D)
HEART VALVES SANTA ANA
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC STRUCTURAL HEART
8200 coral sea street ne
mounds view MN 55112
Manufacturer Contact
paula bixby
8200 coral sea street ne
mounds view, MN 55112
7635055378
MDR Report Key5473834
MDR Text Key39457194
Report Number2025587-2016-00276
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KRH
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K093903
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 03/17/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/02/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/31/2018
Device Model Number900SFC28
Device Catalogue Number900SFC28
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received03/17/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Date Device Manufactured09/05/2013
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age00039 YR
Patient Weight122
-
-