Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.Unknown.Patient age was reported as between 9 and 13 years.(b)(4).The exact date of implant is unknown and was approximately (b)(6) 2016.(b)(6).The 510(k): device is not distributed in the united states, but is similar to device marketed in the usa.Without a lot number the device history records review could not be completed.The subject device has been received and is currently in the evaluation process.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
Manufacturing investigation evaluation: one (1) article of central body f/mef max-l 437 min-l 287 (part 392.901) was received for manufacturing investigation.The article is in a used condition with visible marks of use at the anodized end parts.The department responsible for the assembly and testing of the central body f/mef has evaluated the complained issue.The investigation was to determine if the issue, as it was reported, could be found when manipulating the movable parts.The exact malfunction could not be duplicated during the tests.However, the following anomalies were found: the subcomponent dynamization end piece (part 392.901.013) was making noise and an abnormal type of resistance was felt when turning on it.Also, damages on the o-ring seal, residues on the outer thread, and discoloration of the wrench surface were observed.It is likely that the residue came into the mechanism of the dynamization end piece as a result of insufficient cleaning and reprocessing.No manufacturing related issues were identified and/or confirmed.Device used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|