|
Catalog Number AR-13991N |
Device Problems
Material Fragmentation (1261); Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
|
Patient Problem
Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque (3165)
|
Event Date 03/07/2016 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
No further patient information was provided at the time of this report or made available in response to follow-up communication.No additional adverse consequences have been reported from this event.This device is used for treatment.The device was requested for evaluation but was not returned, therefore the complainant's event could not be verified.The cause of the event could not be determined from the information available and without device evaluation.Device history record review revealed nothing relevant to this event.The typical cause for this type of event would be the use of excessive force to pass the needle through thick or hard tissue or hitting bone with the needle.There is a label on the device warning the user against re-sterilizing, reusing, hitting bone or use of excessive force as these may result in needle breakage or patient injury.This is the first complaint of this type for this part/lot combination.The potential cause(s) of this event will be communicated to the event reporter.If additional relevant information is received, a follow-up report will be submitted.Device was discarded by the facility.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during a rotator cuff repair, the surgeon was using the scorpion device and rapidly firing the scorpion needle into the cuff.Sales rep states the surgeon said he thought something was wrong with the scorpion, but the suture was passed.Upon inspection, the needle tip was still attached and everything was fine.He passed the next suture forcefully, but again it was passed.Once the surgeon finished the repair and was closing the incision site the rep who was present in the case asked to examine the scorpion and discovered that the tip of the needle was gone.Sales rep informed the surgeon; an x-ray was taken and confirmed the tip is in the patient.The surgeon did not want to re-open the patient to locate the tip.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|