• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DEPUY MITEK ULTRA-AGGRESSIVE CUTTER SHAVER BLADES 5.0MM; FMS BLADES & BURRS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DEPUY MITEK ULTRA-AGGRESSIVE CUTTER SHAVER BLADES 5.0MM; FMS BLADES & BURRS Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 287525
Device Problem Material Fragmentation (1261)
Patient Problem Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque (3165)
Event Date 03/09/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Awaiting device return.
 
Event Description
The surgeon informed that the device was releasing microfragments during a shoulder arthroscopy.The image was atypical.In the image appear small gray dots that dr.(b)(6) describes as ¿microfragments of the blade shaver soft tissue ultra-aggressive cutter 5.0¿.The procedure was completed with same like product.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The complaint device was received and evaluated.Visual observation revealed that the device¿s outer and inner shaft were bent severely.Additionally, striation markings were present along the shaft of the inner piece, confirming the reported condition.Typically, a bent shaft is indicative of misuse; due to the fact that the shaft is bent, when the blade is operated, there is increased friction between the inner and outer shaft which could lead to metal shavings as reported.However, in this case, it was confirmed that the device was bent on purpose by the end-user after use so a definitive root cause could not be determined.A batch record review has been conducted to determine if there were any internal processing issues which would have contributed to the nature of the product complaint.Our results indicate that this batch of product was processed without incident and therefore there is no internally assignable cause for the reported problem.Further, a review into the depuy synthes mitek complaints system revealed no other complaints for this lot of devices that were released to distribution.At this point, no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event Description
Additional information received via email from the affiliate on 04/07/2016: the metal shavings were partially removed.The blade shaver was used to remove / aspirate them.The procedure was completed normally.This failure did not extend the procedure time greater than 30 minutes.The first picture of the cutter appears to be bent, do you know how that happened? as we previously reported the bending occurred in the practice of spilling the product after its use to avoid reprocessing, leaving the device totally unusable.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ULTRA-AGGRESSIVE CUTTER SHAVER BLADES 5.0MM
Type of Device
FMS BLADES & BURRS
Manufacturer (Section D)
DEPUY MITEK
325 paramount drive
raynham MA 02767
Manufacturer Contact
jason busch
325 paramount drive
raynham, MA 02767
5088808210
MDR Report Key5546310
MDR Text Key41817417
Report Number1221934-2016-10129
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HRX
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
PK954465
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/09/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/04/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/31/2018
Device Catalogue Number287525
Device Lot NumberM1309038
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Event Location Hospital
Date Report to Manufacturer03/09/2016
Date Manufacturer Received03/23/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/16/2013
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-