|
Echo check after implant of the onxm-25 indicated one of the leaflets of the mitral valve was stuck/not functioning properly.Surgeon re-opened to inspect the valve and one leaflet was not functioning.She rotated the valve several times with the 25mm rotator but had difficulty and each time she rotated, one side or the other was hitting muscle.She then used a rubber-padded hemostat ( or similar metallic instrument), as she felt she couldn't get adequate torque on the mitral valve to rotate it enough.When she tried this, one of the leaflets became dislodged.The loose leaflet was retrieved and she opted to replace the 25mm valve with the onxmc-25/33.Standard technique was used to redo the mitral valve and the leaflets were tested several times during the case to make sure the leaflets were not impinging on any surrounding tissue.The heart was closed again and echo cardiologist confirmed that the valve was functioning properly.The damaged onxm-25 valve was discarded at the hospital and could not be retrieved to be returned for analysis.The conclusion drawn based on the description above is simply "iatrogenic damage", and not a malfunction due to a latent defect in the valve.The ifu warnings are clear, that inability to clear interference with impingement by anatomic structures, or the inability to rotate with the only approved instrument,which is the correct-sized rotator, are causes to require removal of the valve.It is also clearly warned that only the on-x instruments should be used on the valve, and no other, particularly no metallic instruments.Based on tracking records, this is a first implant of an on-x valve by this surgeon.
|