• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. RESTORE SENSOR MRI; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, IMPLANTED (PAIN RELIEF)

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. RESTORE SENSOR MRI; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, IMPLANTED (PAIN RELIEF) Back to Search Results
Model Number 97714
Device Problems Break (1069); Disconnection (1171); Failure to Deliver Energy (1211); High impedance (1291); Unable to Obtain Readings (1516)
Patient Problem Therapeutic Effects, Unexpected (2099)
Event Date 03/17/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Concomitant medical products: product id 977a275, product type: lead.Product id 977a275, product type: lead.(b)(4).A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
The chronic intractable pain patient reported through a manufacturer representative (rep) that they had experienced a ¿cessation of stimulation.¿ it was stated the patient normally felt stimulation with their output set to 3 v, however the patient had increased their stimulation up to 4.8 v at the time of report and yet ¿no stimulation was felt.¿ the patient tried increasing their stimulation again at the time of report while in contact with a manufacturer representative, but the result was the same.The following the day the patient met with a manufacturer presentative to troubleshoot the event.Impedance testing was initially performed at 0.7 v, however values could not be attained, as ¿xxx was displayed.¿ impedance testing was then retried at both 1.5 v and 3 v and ¿high resistance values¿ were displayed each time.The impedances were ¿>40000¿ ohms for all values.The rep reported to the patient¿s physician at that time that ¿the stimulation had stopped due to high resistance values.¿ it was noted that a ¿lead disconnection was suspected¿ or ¿fracture of the leads was suspected.¿ please note the ¿disconnection¿ and ¿fracture¿ indications were alternate translations of the same report; it was unknown at the time of this report which translation was correct.The event was unresolved at the time of report.The patient¿s cessation of stimulation was described as a health hazard at that time.No surgical interventions were performed and it was ¿unknown¿ whether any were planned.
 
Event Description
Additional information clarified that a "fracture of the leads was suspected," not a lead disconnection.It was noted the physician had consulted with the patient regarding explanting their system or replacing the leads, however the patient then stopped visiting the hospital.As a result, it was unknown whether the issue had been resolved as of 2016-apr-24.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Corrected information: if information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RESTORE SENSOR MRI
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, IMPLANTED (PAIN RELIEF)
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer Contact
diane wolf
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635263987
MDR Report Key5564312
MDR Text Key42269096
Report Number3004209178-2016-07117
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LGW
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P840001
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,consum
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 05/13/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/08/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/28/2015
Device Model Number97714
Device Catalogue Number97714
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received04/22/2016
Date Device Manufactured06/04/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-