A medtronic representative reported that, while in a spine procedure, the surgeon alleged there was an error of the pedicle probe.The staff of the hospital inspected the probe and found that the tip of the probe was slightly bent.After the registration, the surgeon suspected that there was an inaccuracy.The tip of the probe was found to be slightly bent.The pedicle probe was replaced with a back-up pedicle probe, and the a back-up probe worked normally, without issue.The navigation system allowed them to verify the instrument.The surgeon used the pointer to check the location, instead of the probe.The surgeon completed the procedure with the use of the navigation system.There was no delay of therapy.There was no impact on patient outcome.
|
Device lot number now provided.Device manufacturing date now provided.Investigation of returned suspect probe finds that as reported, the tip of the probe is slightly bent.However, with markers attached and fully seated, the probe returned good geometry and divot error readings.The probe is fully functional.The reported issue was confirmed to be caused by physical damage of the instrument tip.The hardware investigation found that the reported event was related to a hardware issue.This issue was documented in a medtronic navigation hardware anomaly tracking database.
|