• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SYNTHES USA; ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SYNTHES USA; ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY Back to Search Results
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Bone Fracture(s) (1870); Skin Irritation (2076); Non-union Bone Fracture (2369); Post Operative Wound Infection (2446)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.Smekal, v., et al (2011).Elastic stable intramedullary nailing is best for mid-shaft clavicular fractures without comminution: results in 60 patients.Acta orthopadica, 42: 324-329.This report is for an unknown nail (titanium endomedullary) /unknown quantity/unknown lot.Part unknown, udi is unavailable.(b)(6).The investigation could not be completed and no conclusion could be drawn as no device was returned and no lot number or part number were provided.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event Description
This report is being filed after the subsequent review of the following article: smekal, v., et al (2011).Elastic stable intramedullary nailing is best for mid-shaft clavicular fractures without comminution: results in 60 patients.Acta orthopadica, 42: 324-329.(b)(6).This was a prospective controlled study that compared elastic stable intramedullary nailing (esin) with non-operative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures.Between (b)(6) 2003 and (b)(6) 2007, 120 patients volunteered to participate.Of those, 112 patients completed the study (60 in the operative and 52 in the non-operative group).Patients in the non-operative group were treated with a simple shoulder sling.In the operative group, intramedullary stabilization was performed within 3 days of the trauma.The patient age range in the operative group was 36.8ᠱ2.6; there were 54 males and 6 females.The 2.5 mm titanium endomedullary nails (ten, synthes, (b)(4) , usa) in male and 2 mm tens in female patients were used.Radiographic union was assessed every 4 weeks on 20 degree cephalad anteroposterior and posterior anterior radiographs of the clavicle.Constant shoulder scores and dash scores (dash, disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) were assessed at final follow-up after 2 years.Complications (operative group): two (2) patients - delayed union without further surgical intervention.One (1) patient - deep infection (article did not state treatment given for infection).Five (5) patients -medial skin irritation without telescoping with the need for cutting back the nail under local anesthesia.One (1) patient - refracture (article did not state treatment given for refracture).This report is 1 of 2 for (b)(4).This report is for unknown nail (titanium endomedullary), unknown quantity and lot number.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Type of Device
ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY
Manufacturer (Section D)
SYNTHES USA
1302 wrights lane east
west chester PA 19380
Manufacturer Contact
linda plews
1302 wrights lane east
west chester, PA 19380
6107195000
MDR Report Key5605371
MDR Text Key43539561
Report Number2520274-2016-12164
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HSB
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeSZ
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 04/04/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/25/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Other Device ID NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received04/04/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-