|
The device evo-20-25-15-e, of lot number c835318 was involved in this complaint will not be returned for evaluation, with the information provided a document based investigation was carried out.The customer complaint could be confirmed based on the customer testimony and video of the endoscopy.Comments received from the relevant (b)(6) senior product manager are as follows: ¿i think the main cause of the stent break would be the duration of the stent placement." a review of the qc records for the device involved in this complaint did not reveal any discrepancies that could have contributed to this complaint.Prior to distribution evolution devices are subjected to a visual inspection and functional checks to ensure device integrity.These inspections and functional checks are outlined in internal procedures in place at (b)(6).A review of the manufacturing records for evo-20-25-15-e of lot c835318 did not reveal any discrepancies that could have contributed to this complaint.Evolution® esophageal stent systems is used to maintain patency of malignant esophageal strictures and/or to seal tracheoesophageal fistulas.As per the instructions for use precautions: after stent placement, alternative methods of treatment such as chemotherapy and radiation should not be administered as this may increase risk of stent migration due to tumor shrinkage, stent erosion, and/or mucosal bleeding.Long term patency of this device has not been established.Periodic evaluation is advised.Warnings: the stent is not intended to be removed and is considered a permanent implant.Attempts to remove stent after placement may be cause damage to esophageal mucosa.Based on the complaint description ¿the doctor told us the patient has lived more than expected and patient returned with aphagia that is why they found this issue, the implanted date was (b)(6) 2013¿.The production manager stated ¿stent placement for palliative care generally is for a patient with a limited life expectancy and usually less than a year.The continuous mechanical force of the peristaltic motion and the chemical exposure to the stomach acid over a 3 year period would be a severe test for the stent.¿ according to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.They implanted a new one to solve the new problem.
|