• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CYBERONICS, INC. LEAD MODEL 302-20

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CYBERONICS, INC. LEAD MODEL 302-20 Back to Search Results
Model Number 302-20
Device Problem High impedance (1291)
Patient Problem No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 04/19/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
Patient was referred for a full revision due to high impedance observed on normal mode diagnostics.A system diagnostic test was not performed and therefore the results are not available.No known surgical interventions have occurred to date.
 
Event Description
Patient underwent generator and lead replacement on (b)(6) 2016.During the surgery, the generator was replaced prophylactically first.The impedance with the old lead showed > 10,000 ohms, which confirmed that there was a lead discontinuity.The lead was also revised as a result.Impedance was within normal limits (2144 ohms) after the lead was replaced.The explanted generator and lead have not been received to date.
 
Event Description
The explanted devices were received on 07/29/2016.The device performed according to functional specifications of the current automated final test 102.Analysis of the generator in the pa lab concluded that no abnormal performance or any other type of adverse condition was found.The lead assembly was returned for analysis due to high impedance and lead fracture allegations.These allegations were not verified within the returned lead portions.Though difficult to state conclusively, the presence of a single setscrew mark at the end tip of the connector pin may be a contributing factor for the reported ¿high impedance¿ allegation.However the reason for this condition or the timing of when it may have occurred is unknown.Based on the location of the one of two sets of setscrew marks on the connector pin and scratches from the canted spring observed on the connector ring, it is believed that proper contact between the pulse generator ¿+¿ and ¿¿¿ terminals and the lead connector respective contact points (connector ring and connector pin) existed at one time.The lead connector was inserted completely in a pulse generator and no anomalies that could prevent proper insertion were identified.The electrode array portion was not returned for analysis, an evaluation and resulting commentary cannot be made on that portion of the lead.Other than typical wear and explant related observations, no anomalies were identified in the returned lead portion.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LEAD MODEL 302-20
Type of Device
LEAD
Manufacturer (Section D)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer (Section G)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer Contact
njemile crawley
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston, TX 77058
2812287200
MDR Report Key5660854
MDR Text Key46573334
Report Number1644487-2016-01048
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LYJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Nurse
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 04/22/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/17/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date08/31/2011
Device Model Number302-20
Device Lot Number200910
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer07/29/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Event Location Other
Date Manufacturer Received07/29/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/28/2008
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age32 YR
-
-